Craig’s assertion is that right – or – wrong, all we need to do is agree to a story and it will become true. We in the 9/11 Truth Movement have seen the power of group thinking – remember when the American people rallied around George W’ Bush’s claim that Osama Bin Laden was the mastermind of 9/11. As the people rallied around GWB’s story all other explanations about the World Trade Center because “false” (in their eyes anyways).
If we unite under this statement then really the official story has to be false.
If we’re right about what we’re saying – and if the evidence against the 757 impact is persuasive – then the official story is toast.
However, Craig’s “evidence” is not persuasive and is best described as CABEMOH–BIFAB*.
* Craig Asserts it’s Best Evidence the MOvement Has – But It’s Flimsy At Best