{"id":43,"date":"2018-09-26T03:10:01","date_gmt":"2018-09-26T03:10:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dump-the-shadows.org\/?page_id=43"},"modified":"2022-07-11T00:48:14","modified_gmt":"2022-07-11T00:48:14","slug":"comment-16-c-ring-exit-hole","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"http:\/\/dump-the-shadows.org\/?page_id=43","title":{"rendered":"Comment 16: C-Ring Exit Hole"},"content":{"rendered":"

Craig also asserts that there is no explanation for the C-Ring exit hole<\/p>\n

There’s also no explanation for the round C-ring hole. Because the plane clearly would have lost \u2013 that even that report I just mentioned \u2013 that the plane would have completely lost structural integrity before it even went past half way to that hole. So how does a plane that’s been ripped to shreds allegedly create a round exit hole \u2013 makes no sense.<\/em><\/p>\n

The evidence \u2013 material outside the C-Ring exit hole \u2013 are mostly heavy dense pieces that could have knocked down an unsupported two-brick-thick that was 19 long by 10 feet high. A flimsy wall.<\/p>\n

A careful analysis using columns with accurate dimensions shows that three paths exist through the columns from the E-Ring impact point to the C-Ring Exit hole. Furthermore the debris outside the C-Ring Exit hole is distributed at an angle consistent with parts having momentum that would be traveling from the E-Ring impact point.<\/p>\n

\"\"

Figure 1: Three paths exist through the columns from the E-Ring impact point to the C-Ring Exit hole.<\/p><\/div>\n

The following video analyzes the C-Ring exit hole and the path through the columns.<\/p>\n