Craig’s assertion is that right – or – wrong, all we need to do is agree to a story and it will become true. We in the 9\/11 Truth Movement have seen the power of group thinking \u2013 remember when the American people rallied around George W’ Bush’s claim that Osama Bin Laden was the mastermind of 9\/11. As the people rallied around GWB’s story all other explanations about the World Trade Center because “false” (in their eyes anyways).<\/p>\n
If we unite under this statement then really the official story has to be false. <\/strong><\/p>\n If we’re right about what we’re saying \u2013 and if the evidence against the 757 impact is persuasive \u2013 then the official story is toast.<\/strong><\/p>\n However, Craig’s “evidence” is not persuasive and is best described as CABEMOH\u2013BIFAB<\/a>*.<\/p>\n * C<\/strong>raig A<\/strong>sserts it\u2019s B<\/strong>est E<\/strong>vidence the MO<\/strong>vement H<\/strong>as \u2013 B<\/strong>ut I<\/strong>t\u2019s F<\/strong>limsy A<\/strong>t B<\/strong>est<\/p>\n \u2013<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Craig’s assertion is that right – or – wrong, all we need to do is agree to a story and it will become true. We in the 9\/11 Truth Movement have seen the power of group thinking \u2013 remember when … Continue reading
\n